<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Students on Assessment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalgeography.co.uk/archives/2009/06/students-on-assessment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalgeography.co.uk/archives/2009/06/students-on-assessment/</link>
	<description>ICT in the geography classroom // let&#039;s have a #geographyriot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalgeography.co.uk/archives/2009/06/students-on-assessment/comment-page-1/#comment-42195</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalgeography.co.uk/?p=1262#comment-42195</guid>
		<description>Hi Noel,

Thanks for a really interesting post. Nice to hear about real-life research rather than vague theorising.

It&#039;s interesting how quickly your pupils expanded the possibilities, and in ways that provide far more valid methods of assessment than a test. Also interesting how many methods are collaborative.

It raises the possibilities of combining wikis/blogs with the various exercises (eg films) which would allow you to assess more clearly individual contributions, and therefore start to look at &#039;Working with others&#039; as a skill.

I&#039;ve just set up a small working group within SQA, bringing in Ian S., Ollie, Joniesy, Neil W, Jaye and 2 others to try to think about Future Models of Assessment. At our first meeting 3 days ago, my line manager told them &quot;The exam system&#039;s broken and can&#039;t be fixed.&quot; You could hear the jaws dropping!

Look forward to reading more,

Gordon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Noel,</p>
<p>Thanks for a really interesting post. Nice to hear about real-life research rather than vague theorising.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting how quickly your pupils expanded the possibilities, and in ways that provide far more valid methods of assessment than a test. Also interesting how many methods are collaborative.</p>
<p>It raises the possibilities of combining wikis/blogs with the various exercises (eg films) which would allow you to assess more clearly individual contributions, and therefore start to look at &#8216;Working with others&#8217; as a skill.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just set up a small working group within SQA, bringing in Ian S., Ollie, Joniesy, Neil W, Jaye and 2 others to try to think about Future Models of Assessment. At our first meeting 3 days ago, my line manager told them &#8220;The exam system&#8217;s broken and can&#8217;t be fixed.&#8221; You could hear the jaws dropping!</p>
<p>Look forward to reading more,</p>
<p>Gordon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

